Posts relating to the currently in development and sure to be released 1.5 patch.
Moderator: Staff
RichardMH
Tel the Obnoxious
Posts: 737 Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 3:38 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:
Post
by RichardMH » Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:01 pm
Aslong as you dont flame or spam for no reason you can say whatever you want since the forum will be cleaned at a later stage..
Zopharks
Administrator
Posts: 821 Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 9:41 pm
Post
by Zopharks » Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:35 pm
Forum pruning is a waste of time. Keep the old posts, people might want to read them someday.
[TO]Semore
Reg the Smooth Operator
Posts: 593 Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:29 am
Location: Omnipotent
Post
by [TO]Semore » Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:52 am
They're especially good for references when flaming people. =p
decrease789
Kabuto's Playtoy
Posts: 9 Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:31 pm
Location: Kent, UK
Post
by decrease789 » Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:34 pm
giants 2!! we can only dream. giants is a titantic-style disaster. such a good ship until interplay put a massive great iceberg right in front of it. the only way giants 2 is going to happen is if enough of us band together and make a sequel... and well open-source games = crap
Salazar
Reg the Smooth Operator
Posts: 498 Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 2:26 am
Location: Abingdon, MD
Post
by Salazar » Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:01 pm
giants 2 isin't going to be made. . . . . .
Riku
Lord of the Vimps
Posts: 74 Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:13 pm
Post
by Riku » Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:53 am
Uhh just to note this thread has been dead for about a year
Salazar
Reg the Smooth Operator
Posts: 498 Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 2:26 am
Location: Abingdon, MD
Post
by Salazar » Sat Aug 05, 2006 6:18 pm
tell that to decrease. . .
decrease789
Kabuto's Playtoy
Posts: 9 Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:31 pm
Location: Kent, UK
Post
by decrease789 » Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:18 pm
Timmy 2.0 wrote: tell that to decrease. . .
yeah i knew the post was dead :p but now it has risen for the dead... and turned into a disscussion about a loser who posts to dead threads
Salazar
Reg the Smooth Operator
Posts: 498 Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 2:26 am
Location: Abingdon, MD
Post
by Salazar » Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:37 pm
decrease789 wrote: Timmy 2.0 wrote: tell that to decrease. . .
yeah i knew the post was dead :p but now it has risen for the dead... and turned into a disscussion about a loser who posts to dead threads
Why did it have to "raise from the dead" if the patch is cancelled and we all know and accept it?
you do know by loser you mean yourself since you posted to a year old thread?
Zopharks
Administrator
Posts: 821 Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 9:41 pm
Post
by Zopharks » Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:59 pm
Why are you making such a large issue of this? The sooner you stop contributing to the 'conversation' and subsequently bumping the thread back to the top of the list, the sooner it will return to the obscurity that you seem so militant about preserving.